Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
This day, it is believed that in some many university students live with their families, while other live away from home because their universities an in different places. In this essay I will describe about advantage and disadvantage of both situations.
The advantage, from the issue when they stay away from the family they can learn a lot about life. It is because not only learn to understand them self. But also they learn to understand other people. For example when that have a problem regarding to finance, the first they will search the job for filling a need in them self and the benefit as they live with their families, they will be more controlled with their parents in terms of either requirement or attitude, as results in a psychological aspect, the university student live away from home, they shall be batter prepared to face real after collage.
The disadvantage of this problem, the behavioral aspect when they stay away from family, they less controlled from their families, while other live with family, they have habit tend to be spoilt, it is because they are not living with families will be quicker to know promiscuity if they do not wise they can fall to negative social and while they stay with family, that can more spoilt rather than they stay away from family it is because their familie not confident, if the child can to live independent, so their parents always give their children what they need. As result they live with their families they are not mentally prepare for the real live.
In conclusion, the both have benefit and black hole, but the parents should wise for lives the child, where is the need and the responsibility of the child, the child should transparent about their life on a the parents thus, the need and responsibilities of both children and parents can be balanced.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | dothai | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | nagakhoa | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | faisal420 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-08 | Vahideh_abd | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | kieuoanh.dau | 67 | view |
- The bar charts shows co2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union and European Union funds being spent on different forms of transportation. 78
- The bar chart shows Co2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. And European Union funds being spent on different forms of transportation. 78
- The bar charts compare the differences in the proportion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in 3 diets namely average diet, healthy diet and healthy diet for sport. 84
- The government should spend money to protect the wild animals which are endangered but others think the extinction of wild animals is a natural phenomena and thus ministry should not waste money 38
- give opinion..Nowadays,children spending more time in playing computer games rather than doing sport.Why? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
... should transparent about their life on a the parents thus, the need and responsibili...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, thus, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78481012658 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50863753813 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45253164557 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 20.2975951904 172% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 173.1146769 49.4020404114 350% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 168.0 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.1111111111 20.7667163134 169% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401895534952 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192103938356 0.084324248473 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.197298263208 0.0667982634062 295% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307444452976 0.151304729494 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.217830943329 0.056905535591 383% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.04 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.1190380762 158% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.