The bar chart below represents the porportion of Australian men and women taking part in regular activity in 2010.
A glance at the chart reveals that there is no considerable difference between percentage of women and men who did practice, however women were more dominant than men in all different age groups except the first group (15 to 24).
From the data given, percentage of men‘s participation decreased from 52.8% to 39.5% with rising their ages from 15 to 44 then followed by rising the percentage of doing activity from 43.1% in the age of 45 to 54 to 46.7% in 65 and over.
The trend of doing physical activities between women with different ages were different from men. With increasing age in women, their participation rose too from 47.7% in the age group of 15-24 to 53.3% in 45 to 54 and then reduced gradually to 47.1% in the age of 65 and over. Interestingly the trend of growth and reduction of men and women’s participation is opposite of each other. Among men their activities reduced from 15 to 44 and then climbed from 45 to 65 and over. Nevertheless between women is vice versa first rose and then dropped.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 481, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...nd then climbed from 45 to 65 and over. Nevertheless between women is vice versa first rose ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70646766169 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7402594866 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482587064677 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6794890948 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.25 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402056070521 0.215688989381 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189174108272 0.103423049105 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140608700538 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280377783332 0.15604864568 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124636294508 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.