We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Learning is a continuous process and has no bounds in terms of its sources. The people to whom we share our views can help us to gain our knowledge and enhance our learning. The people whose views contradict from our views can help us in identifying and rectifying our concepts and hence again enhancing the knowledge. So we can learn not only from people whose views we share but also from people whose views contradict our own.
Learning is a cumulative process and with healthy discussion with people we can understand the things in a better way. If a person do only self learning, he can think only in one aspect. Discussion of his learning with the person to whom he share will provides him different aspects of learning on the same issue. Along with that if he argues with the person having contradictory views, it will help him to know all positive and negative aspects and he can make improvements in his learning according to that.
For an example in an debate both in favor and in against candidates present their views on an certain issue. A person sitting in the audience should listen both the aspects on the issue and after listening he can make his own opinion including all if and pros on that particular issue. Thus he can learn from both type of people.
While discussing from a person whose views are contradicting from us, we should be careful in learning because it is also possible they can provide us false information which will certainly degrade our knowledge and learning. So we should be very cautious while learning from these people and should learn only good things from them.
Thus for learning we cannot bound the sources of information, instead of that we should include both type of person i.e. from whom we share the views and from people whose views contradict our own. It will help us in better learning and we can gain and improve a lot.
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine. "A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep 96
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 58
- 18.The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the compla 83
- Fifteen years ago, Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors. Since that time, Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes, and overall stu 28
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 65
Sentence: A person sitting in the audience should listen both the aspects on the issue and after listening he can make his own opinion including all if and pros on that particular issue.
Description: The tag a conjunction, subordinating is not usually followed by and
Suggestion: Refer to if and and
Sentence: Thus for learning we cannot bound the sources of information, instead of that we should include both type of person i.e. from whom we share the views and from people whose views contradict our own.
Description: The word bound is not usually used as a verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Suggestion: Refer to bound
Sentence: The people whose views contradict from our views can help us in identifying and rectifying our concepts and hence again enhancing the knowledge.
Error: rectifying Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Different Words: 140 200
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 333 350
No. of Characters: 1520 1500
No. of Different Words: 140 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.272 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.565 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.437 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 98 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 68 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 46 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 27 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.2 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.093 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.432 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.656 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.387 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5