Which one of these abilities do you think is the most important for a high school teacher teaching students ages 15-18 to have?
- The ability to give students advice to plan for their future;
- The ability to find which students need help and provide them with help;
- The ability to encourage students to learn by themselves outside of the classroom;
With this galloping rate in which societies are flourishing, paying attention to students’ matters is of paramount importance to lead them through prosperity. In this regard, students especially those whose ages are 15-18 should be taken into consideration in various aspects, which could be extended from advising for their future, to giving hand them if they need help, or to encouraging these students to have the ability to learn manifold things outside the classroom. I, personally, am of the opinion that students, in the modern contemporary time, need more consultation about how they should schedule their future. As it comes in following, I will delineate my standpoint.
To begin with, students, particularly those who are in high school, should be taught by the experienced teachers to have a vision for their future, cultivating them to broaden their horizon what they need actually. To put in other words, individuals, at the first flush of youth, are in a sensitive and transient period; the attention of which will contribute to thriving people in a short-term. Teachers, as a critical, significant role in students’ lives, should improve their abilities not only teaching the students but paving the way for them to have the broad perspective for their future as well. Not to mention that students are greatly receptive to their teachers and their words would have far-reaching repercussions on creating their pupils’ characteristics. It has been acknowledged by sociologists that the sustained growth of a community rests on disciplined, organized youths. These individuals, correspondingly, have had proper advisor in the past. Hence, they can positively involve society, having a sense of accomplishment by virtue of implementing their goals. Having considered all the value of teachers with the ability to guide students to have schedules, legislators at schools should appropriate erudite teachers, particularly, for high school.
Furthermore, students will have more self-confidence about themselves thanks to being advocated and consulted by and an erudite, experienced instructor. To put it another way, pupils feel privileged to be under the tutelage of an expert teacher since they are inspired to think for the future, instead of being solely preoccupied with contemporary issues. Indeed, the more adept and thoroughbred a teacher in the classroom is, the more the students take the step through fruition in the future. My own experience demonstrates convincing evidence. When I was a high school student, I had an instructor in literature. She was such a knowledgeable, articulate teacher having pronounced change on everyone in the class since she gave students advice to be disciplined. Students were taught that plans and road maps are a crucially important milestone in every individuals’ life. I put all her suggestions into practice, and now I am jumping through achievement hoops, including accepting to a prestigious university as well as finding a decent job. Had I not to consider to my literature teacher, I would not have a prosperous person in my professional life.
In conclusion, having the aforementioned reasons into account, I surmise that teachers’ ability to advising 15-18 aged students outweigh other choices. That is because students are provided broad perspective as well as they would have more self-confidence as disciplined individuals.
- Which one of these abilities do you think is the most important for a high school teacher teaching students ages 15-18 to have?- The ability to give students advice to plan for their future; - The ability to find which students need help and provide them 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to manifold'
Suggestion: to manifold
...e students to have the ability to learn manifold things outside the classroom. I, person...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to manifold'.
Suggestion: to manifold
...e students to have the ability to learn manifold things outside the classroom. I, person...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 383, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[1]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...h will contribute to thriving people in a short-term. Teachers, as a critical, significant r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 52.1666666667 153% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2895.0 1977.66487455 146% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49335863378 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31390579743 2.67179642975 124% => OK
Unique words: 283.0 212.727598566 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537001897533 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 888.3 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9316134218 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.869565217 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9130434783 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86956521739 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444717817901 0.236089414692 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11068864713 0.076458572812 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095765521222 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.275714805855 0.150856017488 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619722918438 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 11.7677419355 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 10.9000537634 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 86.8835125448 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.