Do you agree or disagree about the statement, “parents should allow their children to use electronic devices for only 1 hour or allow them to use electronics as they like.
As everything of life is like a coin and it has two different sides. People should weigh the pros and cons before jumping to the conclusion. From my perspective, it's one kind of debatable statement where people may take any of the sides. Personally, I strongly agree that parents should give permission to use electronic devices only for one hour rather than as they like for the following reasons.
Firstly, Children should concentrate on study effectively because they have to do well in the examination to make their career bright. If they are involved in using electronic devices most of the time then it will be a waste of time and they will not able to acquire their desired score in the examination. For example, one of my friend’s nephew was a brilliant student in his school at the initial stage. After one year, my friend figured out that his nephew’s result decreasing day by day and his family was so tensed about it. Then my friend tried to figure out the reason and he understood that most of the time his nephew was busy in playing the video game with his friends. In spite of having his final exam knocking at the door, he would have played with his friends and addicted to social media. Then my friend told his parents to be aware of them not to use the electronic device more than one hour per day and it really increased his result after one year.
Secondly, there are some advantages of using the electronic device for more than one hour because some education system of our country is electronic device based. If children cannot use the device for more than one hour then they may not be able to participate in any online classes which duration more than one hour. That’s why I think it is one kind of force not to allow them using the electronic device for more than one hour and it may create a negative impact in their study.
Thirdly, I would like to say that having some advantages using the electronic device for more than one hour, there are a lot of disadvantages inasmuch as children will not make its proper utilization. For instance, nowadays, children are using their electronic devices such as a mobile, laptop for entertainment purposes rather than educational purposes. As a result, they are addicted to the internet and visit many restricted sites which are not good for their life. To make a child erudite and amiable, it’s better to prepare the child in a friendly environment where parents will be their best friends and they will pass most of their times with their children.
Finally, In my view, it’s hard to prove the statement virtually but it’s concluded from the above discussions that children should not use the electronic device for more than one hour. It’s needless to say that if parents do not allow their children to use the electronic device for more than one hour, it will increase the children academic result and intimacy between children and parents.
- Do you agree or disagree about the statement, “parents should allow their children to use electronic devices for only 1 hour or allow them to use electronics as they like. 70
- Today there is a lot of negative news on TV and social media. Some believe that it is a good idea to stop watching the news and take a break while others do not. What is your position? 73
- It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. Do you agree or disagree? 60
- Toward the end of his life, the Chevalier de Seingalt (1725−1798) wrote a long memoir recounting his life and adventures. The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure, but since he met many famous people, including kings and writers, his memoir has 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, really, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for example, for instance, i think, kind of, such as, as a result, in my view, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 513.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76023391813 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75914943092 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55100532694 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432748538012 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.3441135731 48.9658058833 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.1 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.65 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35 5.45110844103 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412805814155 0.236089414692 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146240989575 0.076458572812 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113003892814 0.0737576698707 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277217846087 0.150856017488 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833066014295 0.0645574589148 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.