The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment.
The table presents the percentage of household income which is spent monthly on food and drink, housing, clothing, and entertainment by five European countries.
Overall, the percentages of spending on food & drink and housing account for a majority of income of people in five European nations whereas those figures of clothing and entertainment are significantly low.
According to the table, people in Turkey and Spain spend most of their income on Food & Drink at 36% and 31% respectively, compared to 25% spending in France and 27% of British people. Similarity, the proportion of income spends on housing in France, Germany and UK are relatively high at 31%, 33%, and 37% respectively.
On the contrary, the spending on entertainment and clothing are noticeably low in five nations. Britain and Turkey have the lowest spending on entertainment at 11% in Britain and 10% in Turkey, compared to the expenditure on entertainment of remaining three nations which are from 13% to 19%. People in Europe spend the least for clothing which only range from 7% to 15%.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant (at least 150 words 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16091954023 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00548310909 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540229885057 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3702930941 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353246649107 0.215688989381 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171670346081 0.103423049105 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117470448589 0.0843802449381 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236775842605 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112566283833 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.