wave-energy
The lecture and the reading passage both discuss about wave-energy as alternative energy. In the lecture, however, the professor casts doubt on the advantages of ocean power, which are describes in the reading.
First, the lecturer argues that it is also hard to predict amount of power which are made by ocean while the reading indicates that wave-energy is believable due to it's sustainability and easy to anticipate. To be more specific, according to the lecture, because wave energy is still developing and ocean where facilities are located has harsh condition, it is easy to break down.
Moreover, in contrast to the claim in the reading that the wave energy's constructions are eco-friendly, the professor insist that it can be also harmful for marine environment as fossil fuel. Because some parts of generator such as turbine and floating converters which are located on the surface of ocean contain toxic materials inside and it is able to pollute near environmental condition.
Finally, according to the reading passage, wave power plant do not give any bad effect to the scenic of the inshore. However, the lecturer maintain that it makes view of ocean bad. Because the floating facilities are colored bright due to noticing it's existence to vessels moving around, people who come to the coast near wave farms also can see it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | Minje Choi | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | Minje Choi | 76 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 70
- Parents or other adult relatives should make important decisions for older (15 to 18 years-old) teenage children. 60
- wave-energy 70
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. 76
- Do you agree or disagree that progress is always good? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07692307692 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73624365511 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 145.348785872 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570135746606 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8989888557 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.666666667 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312423003431 0.272083759551 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135345089961 0.0996497079465 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117694534907 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200719462172 0.162205337803 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0685831217645 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.3589403974 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.8541721854 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.