People doing dangerous sport activities like scuba diving and bungi jumbing, they should be responsible for their own life and rescue workers not risk their lives to save people.
Do you agree or disagree.
It is thought by some that people who enrolled in extreme sport activities like scuba diving and bungi jumping should be responsible for their life and rescue workers ought to minimize the risk in order to save their live. In my opinion, while only rescue workers can save people’s life in dangerous situations I believe that individuals should take care about their life and do sport activities only in checked places.
Firstly, it must be admitted that only people from rescue teams are able to save people from the most dangerous situations. All countries around the world have rescuers who are always ready to save people and these people are usually know the places where people usually have alarm situations. As a result, rescue workers should ban any extreme sport activities in the places where other people faced danger situations. In addition, rescuers should check equipment that are responsible for safety in the places where people do extreme sports. The reason to this is that to prevent any accident is easier than to save people from danger situations.
On the other hand, some people like to do extreme sports and they like to find the new places for doing there extreme sports. This is because extreme people think that the more danger place they choose the more adrenalin rush they will get. As a result people try to find new places for scuba diving and bungi jumping in order to be the first person who tried this place. When people use unknown places for such extreme sports they should be careful, they should check their equipment and avoid any danger situations. Moreover, they should inform their families and friends that they are going to do extreme sports in new places and left them location of this place.
In conclusion, although rescue workers are ready to help to people who are in danger situation , people should be careful and avoid doing sport in unknown places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | Jagdeep kaur | 73 | view |
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of tempelton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The diagrams below show the site of a school in 2004 and the plan for changes to the school site in 2024. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of school leavers entering higher education ie colleges and universities and graduate earnings 1 year after graduation 59
- The graph below shows the percentage of urban/suburban and rural households in a European country that had Internet access between 1994 and 2004. 67
- Some people believe that high school shall teach academic subjects like physics and math, others believe it shall teach applied subjects like bakery. Discuss both view and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be responsible for their life and rescue workers ought to minimize the ris...
^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...ave people and these people are usually know the places where people usually have al...
^^^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...lp to people who are in danger situation , people should be careful and avoid doin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8950617284 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2601586581 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425925925926 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7082856388 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.455229204523 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195327101041 0.084324248473 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111115050119 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320328362251 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125219087412 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.78 8.58950901804 79% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 78.4519038076 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.