The given graphs provide information on the US tourism frequency by its residents and foreign guests.
It is worth noting, that the visits from the US were outnumbered than those traveled to the US as a tourist. Furthermore, Americans tended to visit Spain and France more than anything else.
In 1979 visits abroad by the US residents accounted for about 15 million, which is a little bit more than overseas visits. In the next 5 years, the figures for American tourists grew up to around 20 million, while the index for the latter stayed almost stable. At the mid-1980s, the numbers of foreign visitors to the US rose significantly, by 10 million. During the next ten years, the figures for abroad visits by the US people rose marginally, peaked at more than half of all American tourists, while the numbers of visits by overseas residents reached about 27 million.
Regarding the bar graph, more than 10 million of the US tourists visited France in 1999 and just under 9 million preferred to visit Spain. On the contrast, less number of people traveled the USA, Greece, and Turkey. All indicators vary from two to about 3.5 million.
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999. The bar chart shows the most popular contries visited by UK residents in 1999. 78
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 84
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996. 56
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 41
- The graphs below show the Expenditure on Heath Education UAE as percentage of GDP and Infant mortality and life expectancy 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ain and France more than anything else. In 1979 visits abroad by the US resident...
^^^^
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ounted for about 15 million, which is a little bit more than overseas visits. In the next ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82142857143 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55107652999 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55612244898 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.6464202427 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161157400061 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696605455225 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573590037164 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108805825919 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449430984489 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.