The Graph below shows the working hours for men and women in the developing
world between the years 1998 to 2003. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons wherever necessary.
The presented bar chart illustrates how many hours spent at work by men and women in eight underdeveloped nations between 1998 and 2003.
In general, a majority of the time spent at work by both genders was in Mongolia. Additionally, the extra hours contributed by Mexican women was more than women in other countries.
Looking at the details, at first, the average working hours for each mentioned country was just above 6 hours per day. Particularly, in Mongolia, workers of both genders spent more than 8 hours at work, followed by Indians, Mexicans, Malagasy, North Korea, and Mauritians, who spent a little above 6 hours. Regarding the two remaining countries, namely Benin and South Africa, male and female workers there spent between 4 and 6 hours at work.
What’s more, women in Benin had the largest extra time at work with 145 minutes, which was 40 minutes more than Mexican women’s volume. Especially, both figures overtook the average extra hours (69 minutes). Female workers in five remaining nations, excepting Mongolia - where women spent the least amount of time for extra working with only 24 minutes, had less overtime paid for work, ranging from 44 minutes to 65 minutes.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 89
- young people who commit crimes should be treated in the same as adults who commit crimes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- In the past the main role of teachers was providing information Today with various sources of information available to students teachers have no role in modern education To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the ma 89
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, regarding, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1013.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11616161616 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64097962209 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.182209981 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.555555556 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170209414797 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847349694793 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050766186393 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127582134449 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481040265682 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.