The pie charts compare expenditures of US citizens on seven different patterns between 1966 and 1996.
Overall, it can be seen, that Americans spent marginally more money on cars and food than on the other fields. However, over thirty years the spending on food decreased, while cars and computer became significantly more funded.
In 1966 the US residents spent 44% of the money on food, which is about twice as much as they spent on cars. And only 33% of expenditure shares petrol at 9%, furniture at 10%, restraints at 7%, books at 6%, and 1% for computers.
The chart did not change much by 1996. The main spending patterns still were food and cars. In this year Americans spent 45% on cars, while food consumption reduced by 30%, hitting 14% of all budget. Computers became more popular, at 10% compared to 1% spent on books. Restraints became twice occupied, reaching 14%. Spending on furniture and petrol diminished insignificantly by 1-2%.
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 61
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999. The bar chart shows the most popular contries visited by UK residents in 1999. 78
- The map below is of the town of Garlsdon. A new supermarket (S) is planned for the town. The map shows two possible sites for the supermarket.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union. The Pie Chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 84
- The line graph below gives information on cinema attendance in the UK 41
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 764.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92903225806 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6502233232 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 213.3 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.0573670265 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.4545454545 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0909090909 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172334295345 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0779103037913 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956866915589 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131142542412 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110059679327 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.