The line graph illustrates the percentage of visitors to four places ( aquarium, castle,zoo, festival) between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, the percentage of tourists visited aquarium and festival decreased, on the other hand, that of castle and zoo increased. Besides, the percentage of visitors to castle was the highest opposite was true for zoo over the period.
In 1980, the number of people coming to the castle was over 20% and to the zoo was approximately 10%. Until 2000, the percentage of tourists visited castle and zoo all had fluctuations, in which, castle tourists tended to increase, peaking up to 45% in 1995 while the zoo had a slight fluctuation of 10% to 15%. In the next 10 years, the number of people came to the castle decreased slightly ( over 35%) and to the zoo relatively strong increased ( about 20%).
On the contrary, in 1980, the festival attracted the most visitors ( 30%) but fell steadily during the period with under 20%. Also, the number of visitors to aquarium fluctuated from 20 to 35% the period from 1980 to 1990 , then tended to decrease and last in 2010 ( under 10%).
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows the percentages of adults in urban and rural a areas who took part in 4 fee time activities in 1990 and 2010 73
- The diagram shows the plan of medical center in 2008 and 2010 48
- The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France Spain Germany Turkey between 1970 and 2010 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he percentage of visitors to four places aquarium, castle,zoo, festival between 1...
^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , zoo
...isitors to four places aquarium, castle,zoo, festival between 1980 and 2010. Overa...
^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le came to the castle decreased slightly over 35% and to the zoo relatively stron...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to the zoo relatively strong increased about 20%. On the contrary, in 1980, th...
^^
Line 4, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the festival attracted the most visitors 30% but fell steadily during the period ...
^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m 20 to 35% the period from 1980 to 1990 , then tended to decrease and last in 20...
^^
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... 20 to 35% the period from 1980 to 1990 , then tended to decrease and last in 201...
^^
Line 4, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...then tended to decrease and last in 2010 under 10%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, so, then, while, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 906.0 937.175257732 97% => OK
No of words: 188.0 206.0 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81914893617 4.54256449028 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60576504655 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 127.690721649 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510638297872 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 8.0 0.824742268041 970% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.1517398441 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.25 76.5299724578 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 16.8248392259 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 4.34317383033 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 2.54639175258 314% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 7.41237113402 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0841843945371 0.216113520407 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454636104073 0.0766984524023 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469589731768 0.0603063233224 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667712903342 0.12726935374 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416195289801 0.0580467560999 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 8.71597938144 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 41.2886597938 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.