The chart and table show the number of fishers in millions for different regions between 1970, 1980 and 2000, and the world's top ten exporters of fish in 2000.
The bar chart and table illustrate statistics about fishing in millions in different regions from 1970 to 2000.
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official if compared with all regions in 1970, 1980 and 2000 at 9-13-24 million. Coming second in 1970 with 1.3 million, Africa rose to 2 million in 1980 and 2000. Breathtakingly, South America had steady number of fishers in 1.2 million during the period. While the fluctuation occurred in Europe with 0,6 million in 1970, this region contracted to 0,3 million in 1980 and returned to 0,6 million ...
- Unemployment is one of the most serious problems facing developed nations today What are the advantages and or disadvantages of reducing the working week to thirty five hours 33
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is to increase the number of sport facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measure are required. 60
- "Fatherhood ought to be emphasized as much as motherhood. The idea that women are solely responsible for deciding whether or not to have babies leads on to the idea that they are also responsible for bringing the children up." 68
- You are going to study in a college in the UK next year. You would like to stay in a college Hall of Residence.Write a letter to the college giving your accommodation requirements. You should outline what your room and food needs are and also ask what alt 80
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 to 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant Write at least 150 words 85
Comments
Thanks Mr. testbig :)
Thanks Mr. testbig :)
Good Morning from Indonesia,
Good Morning from Indonesia, Mr. testbig. After I re-read the last report writing I composed above, then I realize that there raised some issues with coherence and cohesion. Next, compared with the grammatical mechanics you've shown, I know that is silly mistake I've ever done. As all the reasons I have explained, I go editing my page above. I do hope I could know what the next result you'll give it to me. Please kindly re-mark my last report writing. I look forward to hearing from you, sir.
Thanks in advance.
- eddy
Attribute Value
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 11 10
No. of Words: 219 200
No. of Characters: 1070 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.847 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.886 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.527 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 73 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 54 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 31 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.909 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.209 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.718 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.625 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.081 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Many thanks, Mr.testbig :)
Many thanks, Mr.testbig :)
Sir, I have a question: "Is
Sir, I have a question: "Is there any significant difference between composition which has got marked 7.5 labelled STICKY and 7.5 with no label?" If any, could you please tell me? By comparison with other writings, this issue has been raised.
I look forward to hearing from the answer. Thanks.
- eddy
No difference. The issue is
No difference. The issue is fixed for this essay.
It is glad news for me, many
It is glad news for me, many thanks, sir.
You are welcome, Eddy!
You are welcome, Eddy!
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, where was the high-ranking officials
The chart shows a significant increase in Asia, which was the high-ranking official
1,2 million
1.2 million
flaws:
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 216 200
No. of Characters: 1068 1000
No. of Different Words: 127 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.834 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.944 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.589 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 74 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 56 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 32 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 23 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.526 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.875 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.412 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.721 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.093 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4