The lecturer disputes the suggested author's claims that the clay jars discovered in Iraq were not used as electric batteries in ancient times. She provides several compelling reasons to casts doubt about the author's claims.
First, according to the text the jars were not used as batteries since no electric wires were discovered nearby the jars. The lecturer find this idea debatable.she asserts that indeed they might have been used as batteries because those ruins were discovered by ordinary people. He contends that it is possible that because the jars were not discovered by archaeologists, they were overlooked.
Second, the lecturer contradicts the fallacy of the passage that the copper in the jars was used to hold the scrolls. She asserts that indeed they might have been used as batteries. Theoretically speaking it is possible that a device at some point might be used to serve one purpose. However, later in time it might serve another purpose. She asserts that this exactly what happened with the cylinders that were discovered.
Finally, the author argues that there are no need for batteries at that time since nothing operates on electricity. However, the lecturer confidently refutes this claim by stating that ancient people used electricity to heal from pain. Moreover,The lecturer contends that people believed at that time of the invisible power, thus, they might have used such devices to alleviate pain.
- TPO 12: Do you Agree/Disagree.It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- using vessels as electric batteries in ancient times 71
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood. Do you support or oppose this plan? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 73
- Hail—pieces of ice that form and fall from clouds instead of snow or rain—has always been a problem for farmers in some areas of the United States. Hail pellets can fall with great force and destroy crops in the field. Over the last few decades, a met 73
- TPO 24 Integrated TOEFL Writing 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 55, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to the text the jars were not used as batteries since no electric wires were d...
^^
Line 2, column 136, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...iscovered nearby the jars. The lecturer find this idea debatable.she asserts that in...
^^^^
Line 4, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that ancient people used electricity to heal from pain. Moreover,The lecturer ...
^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , The
...electricity to heal from pain. Moreover,The lecturer contends that people believe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 249, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tricity to heal from pain. Moreover,The lecturer contends that people believed ...
^^
Line 4, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... heal from pain. Moreover,The lecturer contends that people believed at that ti...
^^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve used such devices to alleviate pain.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, look, moreover, second, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 7.30242825607 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1202.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22608695652 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62827435534 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3619194691 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.4615384615 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6923076923 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275805110573 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099015643321 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080290627807 0.0662205650399 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177085551222 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058192092045 0.0443174109184 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.