With the advancement of technology, students are gaining instant access to many sources of information. While many people believe these technologies would gradually replace teachers in education, I tend to support the idea that teachers play an indispensable role in delivering knowledge.
On the one hand, there are numerous perks that other sources like the Internet are getting incredibly essential in education. First one is that, in the old times, teachers and books are the only sources of knowledge for students, while today, they can learn anything, anywhere. People may search for information online easily, watch related videos to visualize the relevant ideas and revise the knowledge with an abundance of available apps. Those virtual teachers make learning process ready and available for people without the limit of time and space. Additionally, not only does the internet enable students to access information in a matter of milliseconds, but it also provides the latest applications of the related concepts. The example of returning rockets from SpaceX illustrated vividly a theoretical idea in physics. Unlike obsolete examples in schools, these latest inventions based on basic physics may inspire students in their study.
On the other hand, the role of teachers is irreplaceable due to many reasons. Firstly, despite the surfeit of sources of information and knowledge, its credibility is probably questionable compared to those from experienced teachers. This is because the Internet is an open source that anyone could upload and alter information. Thus, with the guidance of teachers, students would be able to identify worthy sources and avoid fallacious information. Besides, learning from a well-trained instructor would be the shortest route to adopt knowledge. For instance, if students need to utilise different sources to know about things, they normally suffer many trials and errors. However, with the assistance of mentors who have experienced those before, students may prevent squandering their time and efforts to achieve success in the shortest time.
In conclusion, while alternative sources of information have become prevalent and they offer tremendous benefits in education, I believe the role teachers remain the most crucial in guiding and assisting students.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 60
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city center from 2003 2012 61
- Some people believe that the government should pay for and offer housing to people who lost their homes or cannot afford them To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support it 62
- Some people think that young people are influenced more by their friends than by their parents or teachers. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their w 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60285714286 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90115951485 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568571428571 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0413590968 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.352941176 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.70588235294 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143517224935 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460904414035 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346662726402 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946401796484 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0106501480444 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.