A controversy is often raised about the criteria that students should have to be able to attend universities.
Some groups of people hold the view that university enrollment should be limited to good performers. Others may have an opposing view and feel that all students should have the right to attend universities. From my vantage point . I concur with the later groups of people for two primary reasons that I address in this Essay
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there should be no discrimination on eligible students enrolled in universities. In fact, all students regardless of how good or bad, white or black, male or female should be eligible. If we limit education to only small group of people, we are withholding others from having this right. A vivid example which illustrate my point is the strict criteria which was implemented when I was enrolled in my university. Only the elite were accepted. Thus, many of the students did not have the opportunity to be enrolled.
The second point which deserves some thoughts is that students due to special circumstances might not be lucky enough to get high grades and be admitted to universities. Having such a criteria would not consider an unfortunate events like loss of a dear one, a disease state, or an stressful situation that a person experience. In other words. Some people may be lucky to get good grade. However, others night have some difficulties which leads to loss of opportunities.
Although the aforementioned reason are the first to cross my mind at a glance, they are by no mean the only reason available. In fact, another subtle Point which deserve some thought. The noteworthy, refreshing, intelligible study published in the Journal of higher education which concluded that providing education to a vast group of students contribute significantly to reduce poverty. This study was conducted to see its impact on the less fortunate families
To wrap up, contemplating all the aforementioned reason one soon realizes the importance of providing education to all classes of the community. Without such an approach we are enhancing poverty and expand the gap between the rich and the poor.
- TPO 33: CARVED STONE BALLSReading:Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland. They date from the late Neolithic period, around 4,000 years ago. They are round in shape; they were carved from several types 65
- Pterosaurs were an ancient group of winged animal..... 54
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of 76
- SubmitHome >> Integrated Toefl Writing EssaysEssay topics: TPO-41 - Integrated Writing TaskBurning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash, a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalis 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A good leader should spend more time listening to other people's ideas than taking his or her own ideas. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tend universities. From my vantage point . I concur with the later groups of peopl...
^^
Line 4, column 182, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a criterion' or simply 'criteria'?
Suggestion: a criterion; criteria
...e admitted to universities. Having such a criteria would not consider an unfortunate event...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...loss of a dear one, a disease state, or an stressful situation that a person exper...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, in fact, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 43.0788530466 53% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 362.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05524861878 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94719236294 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530386740331 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.4545076897 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 5.45110844103 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264754825383 0.236089414692 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826240446198 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062684393697 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135489924061 0.150856017488 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538185314753 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.