Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Why
could this be?
Should governments give more financial support to local film industries?
Nowadays, lots of people love to watch exotic movies rather than Vietnamese produced movies. There have, of course, several reasons behind this tendency and I think governments should help local filmmaker by giving more financial support.
It is clear that there are some causes which make foreign films attract more and more people. Firstly, these movies are invested with the amount of money by lots of sponsors around the world. Second, foreign films always are done with tremendous information and computerize technology effect which has a huge charisma with audiences by famous directors. Finally, the good content base on the best novels is produced by an experimented producer that definitely pulls lots of people. For example, “ Harry Potter” always the must-watch foreign film of all the time.
Therefore, I think that governments should help local film industries in order to confront with exotic films by investing money for them. The local producer can hire good actors and actress with the supporting. Besides, the eye-catching propaganda of the film could be made by the director in order to attract more audiences. The discount tickets and promotion solution are introduced to people by films maker with the sponsor of the governments. For example, the movie “ Tam Cam” attract lots of Vietnamese with the supporting of local authorities and it also was the best film that was produced only by the local film-maker.
In conclusion, I believe that financial help from governments not only support local movie industries but also strengthen their productivity in order to attract more local people.
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. Whatcan governments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 67
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology ofdeveloping countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to2010. 61
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. 67
- The pie charts below show the proportions of the total school expenditure in five different sources between 1981 and 2001. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 399, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'films'' or 'film's'?
Suggestion: films'; film's
...on solution are introduced to people by films maker with the sponsor of the governmen...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vie ' Tam Cam' attract lots of Vietnamese with the supporting of local ...
^^
Line 5, column 639, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... produced only by the local film-maker. In conclusion, I believe that financial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, first, firstly, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33590733591 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70940151627 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1448397822 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.307692308 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421619138062 0.244688304435 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142399090556 0.084324248473 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.078277112474 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26218005246 0.151304729494 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726844246089 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.