Many university students live with their families, while others live away
from home because their universities are in different places. What are the
advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
It is true that, although some university students are able to live with their families while
studying in their home town, others are forced to live away from home in order to pursue
their studies. There are advantages and disadvantages of both these situations.
If university students are able to live with their families, there are both benefits and
drawbacks. Firstly, one major advantage is that they are able to economize, since they
do not have to pay for accommodation. Secondly, they enjoy family support in terms of
sharing meals, heating costs, possibly even sharing a room with a brother or sister.
However, the home situation may also have its disadvantages. Family routines are often
disruptive for students who have to concentrate on their studies in a quiet atmosphere.
Without a dedicated space in which to study, for example in the evenings or at
weekends, it is hard to keep up with a study schedule.
On the other hand, when students live away from home, they also face challenges. One
disadvantage is having to find accommodation. Universities are often located in major
urban centres, where rents are high if students have to find a room with even the basic
facilities. However, there are benefits of learning to study independently in another city.
Students are able to escape the distractions of family life, and thereby establish study
routines and form friendships with other students who find themselves in the same
situation. These factors may help them in their studies.
In conclusion, while there will clearly be differences in the personal circumstances of
individual university students, some potential advantages and disadvantages of living at
home or away from home can be identified.
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 61
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding. 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six differentcountries over a twenty-year period. 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 78
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29642857143 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94722067275 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6368692078 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372219126624 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122245225859 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130493157692 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109960212053 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117186220152 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.