The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.
The chart compares the proportion of male and female Australians in six age groups who participated in regular physical activities in 2010.
According to the chart, it is clear that more women spent time exercising than men in the age groups ranging from 35-44, 45-54, 55-64. Specifically, about 53% of ladies were reported to engage in frequent exercise. By contrast, the corresponding figures for men stood at 39.5%, 43.1% and 45.1% respectively. Besides, there was also a 6.7% difference between them in the 25-34 age group.
The smallest gap between the genders can be seen in the eldest age group (65 and over), while 46.7% men and a very close 47.1% women claimed they did physical exercise often. The only age group where men performed better is in the youngest age group of 15 to 24, the number was an impressive 52.8% for men versus 47.7% for women.
To sum up, nearly half of the Australians engaged themselves in regular physical activity and women seemed to show greater interest in general.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | tranhien297 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 11 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason Lou | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | Noah1997 | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Schooling is no longer necessary, since more and more information is accessible on the Internet, and students can study just as well at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, while, in general, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91228070175 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61656535965 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6431177955 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43668440355 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16331118348 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112676106604 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256647310785 0.15604864568 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839283651478 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.