The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three circle graphs illustrate annual expenditure variations in a British educational institution in three sample years of 1981, 1991 and 2001. Overall, teachers’ salaries were the major budgetary item, while insurance accounted for the lowest outlay; the quantities of money on teachers’ salaries, insurance, and furniture and equipment showed an upward trend during the three years while those on other workers’ salaries and resources e.g. books a downward trend.
Starting with staff payments, teachers’ salaries stood at 40% of budget in 1981, rose to 50% in 1991, then declined slightly to 45% in 2001. Payments to support workers, on the other hand, started the period at 28%, fell to 22% in 1991, and further declined to 15% in the final year of the study.
Turning now to other budgetary items, educational resources fluctuated from 15% in the first year to 20% in the second, then dropped to a low of 9% at the close of the study. Furniture and equipment costs, on the other hand, dropped at first from 15% in 1981 to 5% in 1991, then ballooned to 23% by the end of the period. Insurance, always the smallest item of expenditure, was as low as 2% and 3% in 1981 and 1991 respectively, but jumped to 8% in 2001.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why? What can be done to attract local people? 67
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. 84
- Some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 61
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., first, second, so, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90566037736 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8761828715 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542452830189 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.2050001194 43.030603864 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.571428571 112.824112599 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159466761505 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0875305953496 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739689498394 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107296855818 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0271023798706 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.