Scientist believe that in order to protect the environment, people must use less energy in their daily lives. However, most people have not changed the way they live. Why do you think many people have not taken individual action? What could be done to encourage them to take action?
Protecting the environment is a major concern these days, for which there is greater need in reduction of usage. In fact, people have not changed their habits in the utilization of energy. There are several reasons for people have been ignoring the responsibility to take action. There are couple of ways to convince the people. This essay will discuss the reasons in negligence by people and the ways to persuade them.
The information on the seriousness of the environment damage caused due to the energy consumption has not been conveyed to public properly. Moreover, the damages of the environment is not immediately visible and energy is not only factor. The awareness in the common-people mind is low due to governments lack of interest in the advertisement of the damages that the environment facing at the moment. There is no strict regulation in high consumption of energy.
The University of Sydney has conducted a research with 1000 people from various backgrounds, to check their response after a 30 minutes video on the direct link of increased energy consumption impacting the environment, which, showed about 90% of the people started turning the lights off when there is no need. This shows if more illustrative and impacting awareness programs published in media can persuade people to reduce their usage of energy. The government should also consider introducing slab tariff methods in the pricing of energy and increase the price to 200% , which can change the habits of people, in terms of energy usage.
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers. Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion. 84
- As more and more students enter universities, academic qualifications are becoming devalued. To get ahead in many professions, more than one degree is now required and in future it is likely that people will take a number of degree courses before even sta 73
- You have a friend who lives in a city abroad You have decided that you would like to apply to do a course at one of the colleges in this city Write to your friend explaining what you would like to do Tell him her what type of work or studies you have been
- Some people believe that a greater difference in age between parents and children is more beneficial than less of a difference.Do you think the advantages of a greater age difference outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people think that the only way to judge someone’s success in business is by the amount of money they make.Is this a true indicator of the success of a business and in what other ways could success in a business be measured? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
... The University of Sydney has conducted a research with 1000 people from various backgroun...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...of energy and increase the price to 200% , which can change the habits of people, ...
^^
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts of people, in terms of energy usage.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.108 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86132340573 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.5733589345 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.416666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215973926499 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794303665931 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675537314245 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143533130658 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740433467377 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.