The pie charts below show recycling in Sydney, Melbourne and Worldwide.
The pie charts elucidate the percentages of recycling in three different places with three different aspects. At first glance, it is evident that in comparing to other aspects, the recycling of the glass in two Australia’s cities has the most noticeable percentages.
To begin with, the percentage of recycling for plastics in Sydney, which was at four-tenths, is higher rather than Worldwide, which made up at 34%, and Melbourne, which constituted at 21 in 100. Furthermore, another Australia city, which was Melbourne, additionally witnessed a different pattern in which it became the highest places for recycling glass, which was at 56%, and it is higher than the other two places, where Worldwide and Sydney only accounted for 11 in 100 and 38% respectively.
Nevertheless, Worldwide has the immense number of recycling paper rather than Sydney and Melbourne. In regard to this, it is approximately higher at around more than double times rather than the other two Australia cities.
- Women should give up their jobs and go back to their traditional roles of home maker in order to reduce world’s unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Children today are too dependent on computer and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastime than spending all day indoors. 78
- The diagrams below illustrate changes affected in the district park between 2004 and 2014 59
- Bar Chart : home and international students, 2010 – 2012. 73
- International travel is becoming cheaper and more and more countries open their door and with more and more tourists Do the advantages of the increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3164556962 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07175314129 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556962025316 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4933086756 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142593348943 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806455961105 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522475464347 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976692073589 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298812440736 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.