The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013.
The chart illustrates how often people in the USA went to fast food establishments from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, people who ate in fast food restaurants once a week and once or twice a month accounted for the highest percentages, whereas people who either never ate in these restaurants or went every day, showed the lowest figures throughout the whole period.
In 2003 the number of individuals who ate in fast food establishments once a week and once or twice a month accounted for 31% and 30% respectively. For those in the once a week group, this figure increased slightly but then dropped to around 27% in 2013. The once or twice a month category declined to 25% then rose to approximately 33% by 2013.
Conversely, the figure for people who either ate at fast food eateries everyday, or never, stood at under 5% throughout the ten year period. The several times a week category accounted for 17% in 2003, rose in 2006, settling back to around 16% in 2013. The few times a year group rose slightly levelling off at 15% from 2006 to 2013.
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 52
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...le who either ate at fast food eateries everyday, or never, stood at under 5% throughout...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65053763441 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67517827354 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489247311828 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5985681839 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.125 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299216054767 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139560516325 0.103423049105 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12432782421 0.0843802449381 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225783839803 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122921380401 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.