People can access games or films at any time on mobile devices such as smart phones, tablets and laptop computers. Do the advantages of such developments outweigh the disadvantages?
It has become easiest for the people to get access of games and movies through different electronic devices such as, mobile, laptop, tablets and computers. While I believe some times easy access of these thing could be more dangerous for the people and teenagers as well.
In modern world, it can be seen that the world has been moving rapidly towards the technology as compare to last couple of decades whether it is electronic devices or something else. Currently, mobile and computer technology are one of the most leading technology of the 21st century that is steadily going up ward relatively. Moreover, some people believe that it’s quite difficult to spend a single day without mobile which has become essential for daily life as well as for office use. In contrast, mostly parents concerned that mobile and laptop technology is deteriorating habits of many children owing to open access while some says not.
There are few obvious pitfalls of these technologies which can be very harmful for the people especially for teenagers and youngsters that could be devastated their lives for instance; mostly children spend their most of the time with mobile and laptops owing to games and movies that eventually distract their brain towards these things spite of doing study or some extra activity. One of the most noticeable thing was found that
Sitting so much on account of games and movies are making people lazy as well as gaining obesity.
In conclusion, technology of mobile and laptops is more and more worthwhile for every individual whether they are young and children, hence it is the responsibility of parents to stop their offspring to not to use excessively, along with this, government should also form the criteria of usage internet as well as banned those websites which is not good for the children’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-04 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 73 | view |
- Nowadays young people know less about traditions and culture than in the past. What are the reasons for it? Is this a positive development or a negative development? 73
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 56
- Companies use advertisements to increase sales. What are the main reasons that make an Many advertisement effective? Is it a good thing or a bad thing to the society? 78
- Many people today used their phones to communicate by sending text messages than talking. What are the reasons for this? Does it have advantages/disadvantages? 84
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays? 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this thing' or 'these things'?
Suggestion: this thing; these things
...ile I believe some times easy access of these thing could be more dangerous for the people ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, moreover, so, well, while, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 5.60731707317 410% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1545.0 965.302439024 160% => OK
No of words: 305.0 196.424390244 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06557377049 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60261378138 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 106.607317073 159% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554098360656 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 283.868780488 172% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.4958055445 43.030603864 227% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.666666667 112.824112599 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.8888888889 22.9334400587 148% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5555555556 5.23603664747 240% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175184778661 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082375069244 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074394236262 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105251015359 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758070965323 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.98 61.2550243902 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.3012195122 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.