More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines. Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged. To what extend do you agree?
Lifestyle has been changed since the time of revolution. People have more comfortable living than in olden days. Because of the change in lifestyle people are clutched by the variety of diseases which has not seen in the past and hence it is often argued that traditional medicines should be practiced over the modern medication. However, I disagree with this view and think that modern medicines should be followed.
There are multifarious benefits of adopting to modern medicines over the traditional. Firstly, modern medicines provide fast recovery of any disease where traditional methods may take time to cure the same disease. Although, it is beneficial to prefer the traditional way over hazardous chemical drugs in some scenarios. For example, sleeping disorder is one of the biggest issues which many people face these days because of the high level of stress, which could be treated by traditional method known as acupressure which is more effective than the chemical drug.
Secondly, traditional methodologies are not scientifically proven. There is a significant difference in a way people used to live before to these days. In earlier days lives were full of strenuous work and people were much healthy than today. Also there are many evidences where people had to sacrifice the life in olden days because there was no proper treatment available. It proves that traditional methods were inefficient to cure the disease. For example, there was crude death rate due to plague. But because of the advent in technologies there is solution for this disease which is achieved by the researcher and scientist. However some disease cannot eradicate fully but can do stability to greater extent with the help of modern medication.
To summarize, I agree that the traditional way of treatments are free from side effects but modern day techniques are much faster to treat ailments and which are continuously under research of scientist than the traditional medicines which are constant.
- You are applying for a job and need a letter of reference. Write a letter to a former teacher. In your letter:Give details of the jobExplain why it is important to youSuggest what information your teacher could put in the reference 73
- Some people thing that watching sports is waste of leisure time. Do you agree or disagree? 56
- The best way to improve health is to exercise daily.To what extent do you agree? 56
- Most employers interview candidates before hiring them. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? In your opinion, what is the best method for choosing employees? 61
- Advantages and disadvantages of working from home 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at modern medicines should be followed. There are multifarious benefits of adopt...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...may take time to cure the same disease. Although, it is beneficial to prefer the traditi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 244, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nd people were much healthy than today. Also there are many evidences where people h...
^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...hieved by the researcher and scientist. However some disease cannot eradicate fully but...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.253125 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80232708822 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5375 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.801277688 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8823529412 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343269982831 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964033555631 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756035961806 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21827833875 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774914890415 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.