Some people say History is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
it is often argued that which subject is the most important between history and science technology. Personally, I support the idea that science and technology is more crucial than history.
On the one hand, I know that understand the past of local country is vital for the younger, who are easy to develop their spirit to protect the living place as soon as they learn lecture about history. But we know that it is not a practical subject as far as finding a job. When someone is graduated from history, for instance, he is difficult to find a job except being a history teacher, he does not exist a lot of opportunities, whereas who may get a job easier as long as his major is related with science and technology. we can see that the subject of science and technology is more practical than history.
On the other hand, science and technology is more catered with modern society. Nowadays, there are many of techniques, like iPhone, headphone with wireless or even intelligent home system, which requires the technology knowledge of the user, so that it would be strongly recommended for the science and technology student to use. For example, a student with science and technology major may control them effortless since they have learned from the lecture, while a history student may need to learn these techniques tough by self-learning at home. Therefore, the cost of being a history major is bigger than becoming a science and technology lover.
To sum up, as the reason for practical and cost of major, I entirely agree that the subject of science and technology is more important than history.
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- the graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- Some People believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often argued that which subject is t...
^^
Line 2, column 180, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to lecture'
Suggestion: to lecture
... the living place as soon as they learn lecture about history. But we know that it is n...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 466, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ities, whereas who may get a job easier as long as his major is related with scien...
^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...is related with science and technology. we can see that the subject of science and...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nology is more important than history.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84057971014 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68829836888 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518115942029 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.4561752794 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.454545455 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232091625576 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113968870105 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666628331703 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177928180583 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594373337677 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.