The pie charts below shows the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year of 2010.
The pie charts describe the information about the percentage of money spent on various household expenses in Malaysia and Japan in 2010. As an overview, the highest amount of money spent on housing in Malaysia Whereas in the Japan it was on other good and services.
It is clear from the chart that, Malaysia the greatest proportion of expenditure was on housing as 34%. While, in Japan housing accounted for just 21%. However, the huge percentage of money spent on other goods and services at 29% compared with 26% in Malaysia. Further, food came in second place in Japan with 24% which further increased by 3% in the case of Malaysia.
Moving towards the other household expenses, the greatest amount of money splurged on transport at 20% but this was much lower in Malaysia as 10%. At last, 3% of the total money spent on health care in the Malaysia and it got doubled in the case of Japan.
To sum up, the data indicates that in both cases food, housing and other goods and services were the main expenses while, in Japan transport and other goods and services took up a higher amount of money than in Malaysia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-08 | Komalsandhu | 71 | view |
- The pie chart and table give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 47
- The graph shows the data about the annual earning of three different bakeries in London from 2000 to 2010. 73
- Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most large. However, some people think that interviews is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other methods to what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- The chart below shows household spending patterns in the two countries between 1980 and 2008. 40
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the US and Japan between March 1993 and March 1999. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proportion of expenditure was on housing as 34%. While, in Japan housing accounte...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of money splurged on transport at 20% but this was much lower in Malaysia as 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 926.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65326633166 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38928738851 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507537688442 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4522584618 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.888888889 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223774686086 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109868747918 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815629372725 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148441867317 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753876563679 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.