Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people solve problems as a group, they come up with better solutions that if they were to try to solve the problem individually. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Since childhood, we have always taught how important it is to be a part of the group. Being a part of the group have numerous advantages. Few such advantage is collective thinking to tackle the problems. As mentioned in the question, while solving a problem, some may choose to do it alone, while others choose to tackle it by taking others help. In my view, it is always beneficial to solve a problem collectively for two important reasons.
The main reason why I say this is because a group always tends to come up with a better solution. When to try to solve a problem you may think in a specific direction. However, when a larger audience is involved more solutions come up. Not necessarily all are good. But some of them definitely are different than yours and might really tackle the root cause of the problem. To elaborate, during my college I was part of this awesome team which used to make race cars. We called them Mini-Baja buggies. We used to design and manufacture the cars all by ourselves. As you may know, any big project requires proper planning and execution. Once it happened so that we faced a major problem during our manufacturing phase. We wanted to get the chasis ready from the external vendor but due to floods near the manufacturers area we couldn’t get it done. Though, the chasis team was responsible for getiing it manufactured we tackled the problem collectively and brainstormed the alternatives. Finally, we decided to manufacture it from different vendor whom one of my friend knew. As you can see, if the larger group didn’t get involved we would have never gotten the chasis ready in time.
Another reason is you can tackle the problem more cost effectively. When you work in a group you tend to make friends. And you never know when this friendship can come handy. One such example is when I was in college I was part of local Toastmasters club. I made several new friends during my time in the club. One of friend Bill was really a great speaker and good mentor. Moreover, his dad owned a manufacturing plant. Since, we had become a good friends me and my team, which I mentioned in the previous example, got some of our hardware parts manufactured from him. And it saved us a lot of money. Thus, even though Bill was not part of my team, I being his friend reallt helped us. And it was all because I was part of the group.
In all, I firmly believe that tackling a problem as a group is always beneficial. Not only will it yield in better solution but also it will let you make new friends. One should always look at solving a problem in a group.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | JohnSmith96 | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | wnitesh | 70 | view |
| 2019-05-09 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | Anu03 | 76 | view |
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Technology has made it easier for people to connect on a deeper level Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition. 70
- 4-Day WorkweekThe popular 5-day workweek has long been a staple in U.S. business. With employees working 8 hours a day for a total of 40 hours a week, it has been seen as a model of efficiency. However, some companies and government agencies have begun co 71
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ends to come up with a better solution. When to try to solve a problem you may think...
^^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...t some of them definitely are different than yours and might really tackle the root ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 806, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'manufacturers'' or 'manufacturer's'?
Suggestion: manufacturers'; manufacturer's
...ernal vendor but due to floods near the manufacturers area we couldn't get it done. Thou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ckle the problem more cost effectively. When you work in a group you tend to make fr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 652, Rule ID: I_AM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...en though Bill was not part of my team, I being his friend reallt helped us. And ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, moreover, really, so, thus, while, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 470.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55531914894 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64628509568 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487234042553 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 11.0 3.51792114695 313% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0102030071 48.9658058833 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 64.8787878788 100.406767564 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2424242424 20.6045352989 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.69696969697 5.45110844103 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 11.8709677419 177% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215797325871 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057494347978 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657208150772 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139726962684 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398366429249 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 11.7677419355 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 58.1214874552 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.1575268817 63% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.01818996416 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 86.8835125448 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.