People often argue that either make their own decisions for kids to make them independent or affect their decisions to make kids better in the future. I partly agree that kids should follow their own choice, however, a suitable guideline is also important for kids growing.
There are several reasons why I believe that following their own decision can cause a positive growth for children. Each kid has their independent hobbies, he is interested in swimming and she enjoys painting. The hobbies of everyone are different and we should not affect them to develop their natural interest. For example, as long as the kids who want to participate an interesting class to develop their interest, parents should not restrict the hope and provide a chance for them to find their potential area as well as explore it. As a result, the interest may become their strength or even occupation in the future.
On the other hand, the reason to affect their will is that some vital choices could not occur any mistakes. Kids do not know why they have to obey the rules of society. Some kids may not obey the ritual and parents should affect them to change the mind of kids. Everyone should not pass through the traffic road when the traffic light is red, for instance, but some kids may not obey it and throughout with a wrong timing, so adults are responsible to affects the natural mind of the kids as well as teach them that green light is the only way to pass through the traffic road. It is necessary to monitor their will and make the correct decision for the kids. Thus, kids should not follow their own decisions as soon as some critical matter.
To sum up, I believe that the teaching methods for the kids should be balanced, peoples should not only learn to afford freedom for kids to make their own choices but also restrict the freedom and decide a choice for the kids.
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008 11
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 61
- The pie charts beloww show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wish. Other people believe that it is importa 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62162162162 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2698412293 2.80592935109 81% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48048048048 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.979005598 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226746917012 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973115358404 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641302043631 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162390350441 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251931883978 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 50.2224549098 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.