People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
Over the past decades, environmental issues have never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. People now have a lack of knowledge about the natural world’s role. While there are a rich variety of reasons to explain this problem, there are ways in which people can improve their understanding.
I believe that there are two main reasons why people don’t have a good grasp of the values of nature. Firstly, people now are extremely occupied with their careers and hobbies, resulting in a significant increase in the amount of time they spend for themselves. Instead of learning information about the natural world in their free time, they go to the gym, meet their friends at a reputable restaurant, for example. Secondly, many traditional festivals related to nature have fallen gradually. For instance, some celebrations derived from the farmers’ hopes for an abundant crop were disappeared now, causing the lack of connections between people and nature.
However, people can broaden their knowledge about the natural world in various ways. Advances in technology supply a source of information on the Internet so that people can approach by themselves. This will improve the awareness of environmental issues and encourage people to take action on natural problems. Besides, governments should impose more legislations on offenders who degrade nature, and this will educate people about the importance of global preservation.
In conclusion, compared to those who lived in the last decades, young people now don’t have enough knowledge about the natural world. However, there are many ways that people can overcome this lack of understanding.
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44827586207 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88839594563 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567049808429 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2481608398 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.466788943922 0.244688304435 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163593204127 0.084324248473 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866278116979 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.304731757982 0.151304729494 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373529558892 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.