Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Over the past decades, the way of learning has never failed to draw public attention and provoke debates. Although learning from newspaper is a popular traditional way, the issue as to whether learning through other media is more efficient or not remains controversial. From my own perspective, I think the later one is reasonable.
Some opponents argue that newspaper is an authorized knowledge source which provides accurate information. Firstly, they think media never can replace newspaper because information from other media sometimes is wrong or even deliberately intended to cause harm. In contrast, there is a huge number of editorial policies at journalism in order to approve the quality of contents on newspaper before being printed. Secondly, people argue that learning by media tools such as television, laptop or telephone can harm learners as keeping their eyes glued to screens can lead to many negative affection on both their health and mind.
On the other hand, there are numerous official websites or channels managed by the government or well-known organization which provide a sea of knowledge can help people to have a good grasp on various fields. Thanks to advances in technology, it is really easy for people nowadays to access online knowledge sources. Furthermore, almost of residents are computer-literate so they will be able to make use of technologies to learn in an efficient way which help them to save time and money. Besides, media can provide up-to-minute news with attractive images and sounds which appeal to audiences; while information from newspaper is usually obsolete and quite boring.
In conclusion, although printed media is a good traditional source for learning, I still believe that media is the most convenient tool for people who want to broaden their horizon. In order to get accurate online information, people should weight up pros and cons when choosing data sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-19 | Nguyen Thuy Trang | 78 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 75
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...is a popular traditional way, the issue as to whether learning through other media is more ef...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...le to make use of technologies to learn in an efficient way which help them to save time and money....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, really, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, as to, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28664495114 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89959735184 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618892508143 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0399227168 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.846153846 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253937950208 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077481865001 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693773842837 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144332994038 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509831240187 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.