More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television, microwave oven and rice cooker. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Household appliances play an important role in our home so the quantity of people purchasing television, microwave oven and rice cooker is dramatically increasing day by day. Although there are some positive aspects of this trend but I think that there are a lot of demerits that shouldn’t be ignored.
Advances in household technologies bring many benefits undoubtedly. Firstly, they revolutionize people life by helping people to do all tasks without any difficulty. Therefore, people can work efficiently and have more free time so that they can spend on taking care of their families. Modern household goods not only upgrade living standard but also provide a large entertainment source such as watching TV, playing video games which gradually becomes an important part of our life, especially children.
On the other hand, I think that people nowadays are over-reliant on household goods. In fact, those appliances can lead to a lot of health risks if people use it constantly. For example, children usually keep their eyes glued on screens all day which can affect negatively not only on their eyes but also on their characters. Moreover, people regularly spend a lot of money buying goods without weighting up pros and cons even though they are unnecessary sometimes. The reason for this case is that people are usually swayed by advertisements so that many brand can take advantages of customers, make them buy all the thing appeared on TV. For a long term, people will waste a lot of money buying merchandises, then this trend will affect negatively on both individuals and the whole country’s economy.
In conclusion, although using household goods has many merits, people should think carefully before making a decision in order to avoid purchasing uncontrollably.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-09 | Thai Vu | 75 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world? 61
- Some people believe that newspaper is the best way to learn, while others believe that more effective way is through other media. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... part of our life, especially children. On the other hand, I think that people n...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun brand seems to be countable; consider using: 'many brands'.
Suggestion: many brands
...sually swayed by advertisements so that many brand can take advantages of customers, make ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 809, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and the whole country's economy. In conclusion, although using household ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24041811847 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95967959185 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0729150109 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.692307692 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0769230769 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3076923077 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255221315726 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816246014548 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412501068963 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147405857102 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398823329884 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.