The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050.
The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050.
Overall, people in both countries are going to grow older in the next 50 years. The age group 0-14 tend to decrease in the future.
In 2000, just over half of the population was aged 0-14 in Yemen while this figure was 14.3% in Italy. People aged 15-59 accounted for 46.3% and 61.6%, in Yemen and Italy, respectively. The group age over 60 occupied 3.6% in Yemen while this figure in Italy was nearly a quarter.
In 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 is expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% to 57.3%, the children who aged under 15 will drop dramatically to 37%. In Italy, although the group of age 15-59 is predicted to decrease quickly to 46.2%, people aged over 60 tend to rise nearly double from 24,1 % in 2000.
- The line charts compare the number of people who emigrate and immigrate in the UK while the bar graph shows the net of migration between 1999 and 2008. 73
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie graphs below compare the percentages of the population in three different age groups, in two nations, in 2000 and 2050. 61
- the diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal 73
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2050, in Yemen, while people aged 15-59 is expected to grow rapidly from 46.3% t...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rise nearly double from 24,1 % in 2000.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56493506494 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26399221952 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551948051948 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4181547297 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.875 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318694346334 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177801918293 0.103423049105 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.312358923064 0.0843802449381 370% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308858854314 0.15604864568 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.399987459014 0.0819641961636 488% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 40.7170731707 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.