some people think that national sports teams and individual men and women who represent their country should be financially supported by the government. However, others argue that they should be funded by non-government sources (e.g. Business, scholarships, etc). Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a point of view exists that authorities should sponsor the athletes who demonstrate the highest bar in dedicated sport and come to international competition on behalf of theirs flags. Which is fair enough taking into account the aspect of driving prestige for motherland. Some others believe sportsmen have to pay by themselves or supported by private business, non-government funds, charity. This argument is applicable regarding growth of self awareness and due to opportunity to promote the brand, business or fund.
Let’s examine first state. Preparation of any sportsman or national sport team is very complex and time consuming process. It get started from childhood and goes along all active life. Therefore the source of funding should be reliable enough to keep consistency and permanent amount. Often such level of credibility is possible on country level only. Moreover, World tournament is the competition country vs country, and every sportsman is proud to struggle for their colors. That point is becoming the main argument for the sake of central budgeting.
On the other hand, we find some examples out when large companies are able to invest a lot of money for creating and developing teams. For instance, football clubs, Formula 1 teams are supporting by commerce and usually being assumed like national. It has own advantages in terms of brand’s strong motivation to deliver the best result because of bonuses that athletes are getting for.
There are different ways of growing super sportsmen who can do the own best on the highest level: funded by government and by business. Every source has strengths and weaknesses. At that time both are aiming to get the top within different sort of professional sport. By my humble opinion, sport developing by authority is more sustainable and reliable in terms of representation on international stage.
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 89
- Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in the local community who need it. Others, however, prefer to give money to national and international charitable organizations. Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially be younger people, is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we shohuld try to prevent? 78
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 78
- Traditional medicine such as acupuncture and herbal remedies is very popular in some countries Those who practise traditional medicine claim that it is better than modern medicine in maintaining and improving health Do you agree or disagree with this view 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t state. Preparation of any sportsman or national sport team is very complex and ...
^^
Line 3, column 133, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gets'?
Suggestion: gets
... complex and time consuming process. It get started from childhood and goes along a...
^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ildhood and goes along all active life. Therefore the source of funding should be reliabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstance, football clubs, Formula 1 teams are supporting by commerce and usually b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, sort of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29568106312 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8878898781 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647840531561 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.7802052726 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5555555556 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225212269558 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554621678987 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562536869551 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120389189698 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336786285844 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.16 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.