The author claims an argument based on the letter to the school in Centerville, is that all the students of that particular school should undergo obligatory driving instructions.in order to reduce the accidents in that locality.although, the author's argument seems to be plausible. however, close scrutiny reveals its logical untenability.
Firstly, the author claims that only teenagers in that locality are responsible for the accidents, it is not necessarily to be true, there neither not proper evidence nor any statistical to bolster this argument, the accidents can be caused by any age group of people in that locality, claiming only the teenagers is not supportive.
secondly, the obligatory driving instruction courses by the school is not a practical course .rather, its a theoretical curriculum to inculcate the driving instructions to the students, it is subjectable to the matter of students eager to learn the curriculum which they have already known to them, and also that the authors' assumption is that the education program will drastically reduce the accidents in that locality, there is no strong evidence to support this argument.
thirdly, it is paramount that for the parents to teach their offspring regarding driving safety, their hectic schedule does not inhibit them to inculcate their kids about their safety while driving. furthermore, it is also claimed that the affordability of the students in the driving schools to learn the driving instructions.
To conclude, the authors claim is incomplete to strengthen the argument, the author has to provide more information to support the argument in a pursuasive way.without further evidences the authors assertion includes lots of logical flaws
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasonin 83
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field. 33
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. Write a response in chich you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the 16
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 75
- “Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places” 70
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 7 2
No. of Sentences: 5 15
No. of Words: 267 350
No. of Characters: 1425 1500
No. of Different Words: 135 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.042 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.337 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.997 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 65 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 43 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 53.4 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.563 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.8 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.547 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 1 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.25 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ccidents in that locality.although, the authors argument seems to be plausible. however...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...authors argument seems to be plausible. however, close scrutiny reveals its logical unt...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
...rgument seems to be plausible. however, close scrutiny reveals its logical untenability. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
... the teenagers is not supportive. secondly, the obligatory driving instruction cou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... by the school is not a practical course .rather, its a theoretical curriculum to...
^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chool is not a practical course .rather, its a theoretical curriculum to inculcat...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...ool is not a practical course .rather, its a theoretical curriculum to inculcate t...
^^^
Line 7, column 319, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...lready known to them, and also that the authors assumption is that the education progra...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 413, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...drastically reduce the accidents in that locality, there is no strong evidence to...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thirdly
...g evidence to support this argument. thirdly, it is paramount that for the parents t...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 200, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
... kids about their safety while driving. furthermore, it is also claimed that the affordabil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 191, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...asive way.without further evidences the authors assertion includes lots of logical flaw...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 2260.96107784 65% => OK
No of words: 267.0 441.139720559 61% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50187265918 5.12650576532 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.56307096286 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10208691546 2.78398813304 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 204.123752495 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.468620217663 113% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 705.55239521 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 19.7664670659 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.8473053892 166% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 127.603019605 57.8364921388 221% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 209.857142857 119.503703932 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1428571429 23.324526521 164% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.8571428571 5.70786347227 278% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.25449101796 228% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.20758483034 37% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118342424839 0.218282227539 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559853286644 0.0743258471296 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600129922162 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0664701162944 0.128457276422 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0541323740229 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 14.3799401198 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.45 48.3550499002 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.197005988 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.5979740519 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32208582834 119% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 12.3882235529 165% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 11.1389221557 154% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.