A students performance can be assessed using two method which are formal examination or continual assessment. While Formal examination are useful in testing the students capacity to grasp and remember the lessons taught, continual assessment on the other hand helps in understanding the child's creativity and also their weakness. I believe although students need to be tested through written and oral examination, but, providing them with coursework and projects encourages them to use their mind and portray their understandings in a better manner.
To begin with, formal exams enables the student to study hard and increases their ability to memories the answers or concepts and replicate the same during their examination. However, some students are pressurized by their parents to get good marks and excel in their exams. According to a recent study, many students committed suicide as they had failed to live up to their parents expectation. As result, although this is the most common and widely used method, it may not be the most effective and also not suitable for all children.
Whereas, continual assessment is a slow process and involves a lot of time and patience to execute, it is proved to be beneficial for child development in the long run. For instance, according to the survey carried out by the guardian many students preferred showcasing their skills and knowledge through projects and presentations rather than giving an exam on the same topic. Also, they felt comfortable as their teachers or guides were there to help them if they got stuck on any topic. Moreover, students who suffer from anxiety or depression found it easier to express themselves.
Keeping all the above points in mind, providing students with coursework seems to be beneficial not only assessing the student's performance but it also develops their confidence and creativity. It helps them to read more and use other soft skills in addition to interpreting their learning's in their own style and not in a structured format. Thus, before assessing the students we need to ask ourselves is this method effective?
- Some People believe the people have the right to university education, and government should make it free no matter what their financial background. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people say that government should break down all the historical buildings and replace them with modern buildings Do you agree or disagree 90
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment in your letter.• Describe the problem with the equipment• Explain how this problem is affecting 56
- Some people believe that the libraries are a waste of resources and money so computers should replace them However others do not agree Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- You work at home and have a problem with a piece of equipment that you use for your job.Write a letter to the shop or company which supplied the equipment in your letter.• Describe the problem with the equipment• Explain how this problem is affecting 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
A students performance can be assessed using two m...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...l examination are useful in testing the students capacity to grasp and remember the less...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...to be beneficial not only assessing the students performance but it also develops their ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19941348974 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82988011469 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574780058651 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9485071153 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.642857143 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3571428571 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182856106363 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745536837142 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651456990297 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12436083804 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531604185296 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.