The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.
Summarize the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart demonstrates the proportion of employment in 6 countries in the world, divided by genders over the 10-year period.
As is observes, both men and women in 6 countries followed a steep upward trend in terms of employment rates between 1995 and 2005. In addition, it can be clearly seen that the percentage of employed males was always higher than women in all countries and the overall employment conditions in Iceland and Switzerland was comparatively better than the other four countries.
In details, over a half population of Switzerland was employed with nearly the same figures between women and men. In 1995, the percentage of male workers in Switzerland experience a moderate increase by almost 10 percentage points from around 65% in 1995 to approximately 75% in 2005. Almost 70% of women in Switzerland were employed whereas there was just over 50% in 1995. The employment rates of males in Iceland is the highest among six countries in 2005 with over 80%, while the proportion of females who were employed was comparatively low with only about 40%.
Moreover, the employment rates of male in Australia in 2005, New Zealand, UK and the USA were nearly similar with around 70% while this figure was less than 60% in 2005. On the contrary, there was a great disparity between female and male employment rates in Australia and New Zealand, making up just over 20% of their female’s population. After a decade, the female employment percentage of Australia and New Zealand doubled to nearly 40% as opposed to over 60% of Uk and the USA.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | kaka singh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | pritam | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-17 | Ngoc Nguyen | 67 | view |
| 2015-03-29 | nguyenkhaccuong | 60 | view |
- the chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010. 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reason for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 92
- Some people think that good heath is very important to every person, so medical service should not be run by profit- making companies. DO the advantages of private health care outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a psitive or negative development? 84
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional culture are incompatible. To what extentdo you agree or disagree with this view 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the same figures between women and men. In 1995, the percentage of male workers in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
moreover, whereas, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9358490566 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80716674233 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494339622642 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 387.0 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6842721454 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.8 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15346463684 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757426272607 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374232040515 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101169445683 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276426732616 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.