This chart below provides us information about comparison of two nominal data, genders and their difference in primary, secondary and tertiary education between developed and developing countries on an interval scale from 1990 to 2000 years.
Overall, It’s clearly seen that in developed countries the number of females were slightly more than in developing countries between 1990 and 2000. Tertiary education shows the most number of girls per 100 boys in developed country.
According to developing countries, the total number of girls in primary education were a little higher (83) in comparison with secondary and tertiary education where the numbers of girls were 72 and 66, respectively, in 1999. However, in 2000, in secondary education, the amount of females (87) was nearly as in primary education. (82). Furthemore, in tertiary education the number of girls was the least (75) among the other levels of education at the same year.
By contrast, surprisingly, in developed countries there were considerably more girls in tertiary education and reached 112 while, in primary and secondary education there were only 96 and 99, respectively, between 1990 and 2000. Moreover, it is noticeable that in all levels of education, the amount of females grew starting with 66 in 1990 and got 112 in 2000.
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 78
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 73
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to more than technology in homes in the UK. 67
- The table below shows how young people in Tokyo, Japan, listened to music over the previous month. The pie chart shows a record company’s international findings about whether people preferred live or recorded music.Summarize the information by selecting 73
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on about comparison of two nominal data, genders and their difference in primar...
^^
Line 1, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of two nominal data, genders and their difference in primary, secondary and te...
^^
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... data, genders and their difference in primary, secondary and tertiary educatio...
^^
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rimary, secondary and tertiary education between developed and developing countri...
^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eveloping countries on an interval scale from 1990 to 2000 years. Overall, It...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eveloped countries the number of females were slightly more than in developing ...
^^
Line 3, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed countries the number of females were slightly more than in developing countr...
^^
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of females were slightly more than in developing countries between 1990 and 20...
^^
Line 5, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber of girls in primary education were a little higher 83 in comparison with se...
^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h secondary and tertiary education where the numbers of girls were 72 and 66 res...
^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucation where the numbers of girls were 72 and 66 respectively in 1999. However,...
^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dary education, the amount of females 87 was nearly as in primary education. 82 ...
^^
Line 5, column 304, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on, the amount of females 87 was nearly as in primary education. 82 Furthemore, ...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... among the other levels of educations at the same year. By contrast, surprisi...
^^
Line 7, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n all levels of education, the number of females grew from 66 to 112.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29292929293 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85174253147 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535353535354 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.7418877378 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194646736115 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104065526369 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718983524044 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119900704152 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279439702095 0.0819641961636 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.