Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information maybe relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is often asked by employers about the hobbies and personal information of the job applicants. Some may feel it be of relevance and great use while others don't. In my opinion, this data should not be overlooked as it may produce quality results. In this essay, both the views and how getting to know these factors may produce effective results would be discussed.
Knowing the employees on personal grounds may rather be irrelevant because the workplace has to be strictly dealt with professionally. Not only the workplace should focus on just the professional factors of the employee but also should not allow any hindrance in the work due to personal reasons. For example, a recent survey conducted by the New York Times concluded that fifty-five percent of the top companies prefer dealing with just the qualities of the workers such as logical skills, aptitude, IQ and reasoning ability yielding enhanced throughput and shooted earnings. If the employee is stripped-off from the personal part of life during office hours, no obstruction and destruction could be experienced and the complete focus would be steered on the work.
Nonetheless, knowing the newcomers on personal factors might help in striking better management, thus producing quality output. Not only does it helps in analysing the job applicants better but also helps in making a decision as to whether the person is the right fit for the job or not. Also, many companies such as Accenture have strict rules for its workforce of not getting involved with their co-workers of the same project. The sole purpose of imposing this rule is to avoid any personal preference that may be paid heed to while promotions. Thus, enabling them to stress out this rule more if the marital status of the applicant is known, hence helping in transparent promotions.
In conclusion, working only on a professional basis may seem to be inhuman as all resources should have a balanced work and personal life which might be better managed if the personal information of the employees are paid attention to and hence helping in the determination of the right fit for the job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-19 | Rahul007 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | Kamal2017 | 89 | view |
| 2018-09-04 | Ismail Mamoun | 56 | view |
| 2018-06-28 | johnmathewg | 61 | view |
- Modern technology is now very common in most workplaces. How do you think this has changed the way we work? Do you think there are disadvantages relying too much on technology? 89
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he/she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter. say why he/she would not enjoy going to college. explain 87
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information maybe relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views and 73
- Some people believe that money is the most important factor for achieving happiness. However, others believe that happiness has nothing to do with money. Agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowle 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...of relevance and great use while others dont. In my opinion, this data should not be...
^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'help'?
Suggestion: help
...ducing quality output. Not only does it helps in analysing the job applicants better ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'help'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: help
...ducing quality output. Not only does it helps in analysing the job applicants better ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ter but also helps in making a decision as to whether the person is the right fit for the job...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01971830986 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7755785956 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546478873239 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.1236265475 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.285714286 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171344309477 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667130170858 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615471076535 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111833937407 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456343578942 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.