The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip from 2010 to 2015.
The maps elucidate the alterations in the centre of a slight city which called as Islip between 2010 and 2015. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the existence of the dual carriageway in 2015.
To begin with the north part of the town, the presence of new shopping centre, new bus station and new car park, and new housing had replaced the position of the shops and the countryside in previous time. To the middle of the dual carriageway, there was a new pedestrians’ road which constructed in the place of the main road in 2010.
In accordance with the other changes, 2010 to 2015 witnessed a dramatic alteration for the existence of new dual carriageway where it surrounds numerous facilities in the centre of the town. Furthermore, there was new houses and new park, which was renovated to be a smaller park in the south of the new car park. In contrast, the position of the school and the shops, which were located in the south side of pedestrian’ road, remained unchanged over the entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-29 | Nabeel Raja | 67 | view |
- Bar Chart : The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 84
- Maps show the changes of the lakeside (2000 – 2009). 67
- Recycling rate for selected materials :1982 - 2010 78
- Bar chart : Shares of expenditures for selected categories, United States, Canada, United Kingdom and Japan, 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75543478261 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83584748437 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532608695652 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9933967177 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148693038639 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892126858085 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11993095286 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127324257847 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972410337203 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.