the two maps below show road access to the city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make a comparison where relevant.
The given maps illustrate the difference of roadway entrance to city medical center over a three-year period between 2007 and 2010.
It can be clearly seen that the principal change to the city hospital’s surrounding were infrastructures such as newly roundabout, vehicle car park’s position, and the bus stop that later improved into the bus station. However, there was no change on the ring road around the city hospital.
Prior in 2010, exactly three years ago, there were no roundabouts built near the city health center but subsequently, two roundabouts were constructed on both ends of the hospital road in the south of the town health center. In addition, newly bus station was established to replace the bus stop on the left-side of hospital road and connected to both roundabouts.
Automobile park for staff and the public was divided into two separate places. The staff car park stayed at the current position on the northern right-hand side city road, while public vehicle park moved to the eastern of the town medical center, adjacent to ring road.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | radiatesun | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | radiatesun | 78 | view |
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- the two maps below show road access to the city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make a comparison where relevant. 78
- the two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparison where relevant. 78
- These days many children spend a lot of their time playing computer games but little time doing sports.Why is this?Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 61
- - 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13636363636 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78916513472 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8208208924 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1428571429 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152989258431 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738644859881 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311253006945 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0966423709161 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252266241028 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.