Traffic cognestion and pollution are the growing issues for most of the countries. Some advocates believe that the best way to reduce this problem could be maximizing price of petrol. However, in my opinion, I fully disagree to this view and even believe, replacing old vechiles as well as encouraging use of public transportation would help a lot in eliminating these problem.
Firstly, the rise of petrol price would hamper a lot in the enocomy of the country. The cost of transporting goods across the country will be high and eventually, there will be inflation in market for every commodity. Thus, in order to eradicate traffic issues, it would be better idea to consider replacing old vechiles. These old vechiles pollutes air, water and soil because they take out more nitrous oxide . For instance; decreased ozone layer and acid rain is one of the major consequence of using old vechile. Therefore, rather than increasing price of petrol, people should be encouraged to replace old vechile. For that, government can bring various scheme for exchanging and buying new vechiles.
On the other hand, traffic problem can only be reduced if people use more public transportation rather than purchasing their own vechile. There is an increasing car ownership all over the world because of its cheap price. When people travel through public vechile, around 500-800 people can reach their destiny with single vechile but when those people use individual car then there will be traffic crowd. Easy accessible to station and cheap bus fare would help public to use local buses and trains. However, people doesnot feel comfortable travelling in overcrowded bus. Thus, government must faciliate more public transport with cheap fare and attractive facilities in order to reduce traffic problem.
To sum up, increased petrol price cannot bring control over traffic and pollution but would negatively effect economy of a country. Using new vechile and public vechile would help a lot in minimizing this problem. I think, government must work on faciliating service in these area for eliminating traffic and pollution in their country.
- Beside alot of advantages, some people believe that the internet creates many problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extend do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 73
- Children find it difficult to concentrate on or pay attention to their study in school. What are the reasons? How can we solve this problem? 56
- Vaccinating children against preventable diseases is not only unnecessary but also dangerous.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...encouraging use of public transportation would help a lot in eliminating these pr...
^^
Line 1, column 365, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this problem' or 'these problems'?
Suggestion: this problem; these problems
...tation would help a lot in eliminating these problem. Firstly, the rise of petrol price ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...because they take out more nitrous oxide . For instance; decreased ozone layer and...
^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[7]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ffic and pollution but would negatively effect economy of a country. Using new vechile...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...ent must work on faciliating service in these area for eliminating traffic and pollution i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i think, as well as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1794.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23032069971 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65059535951 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553935860058 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0859704474 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4210526316 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145785856235 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522285042014 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487381876792 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104109922818 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304577120758 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.