the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant.
The chart below illustrates the proportion of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales from 1918 to 2011. It can be clearly seen from the chart that, households in owned accommodation and households in rented accommodation had a reverse trend in comparison with each other.
According to the chart, the percentage of family which rented an accommodation in 1918 stood at just under 80 per cent and almost 4 time as high as the other one. Then, this figure decreased sharply to one half from 1918 to 1971, equal with the proportion of the households which did not have their own house and keep fall significantly to approximately 30 per cent untill 2001 before increased slightly in 2011.
By contrast, between 1918 and 2001 saw a dramatic rise in the percentage of family in their own accommodation from just above one fifth to just below 70 per cent. Finally, the proportion of households live in their own house accounted for over 60 per cent in 2011, twice as many as the percentage of the family rented an accommodation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Ji Due | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | CharanpreetSingh | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Loi Chau | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | aria etemadi | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-04 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss bọth views and give your own opinion. 67
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.Summarize he information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table below compares actual and predicted figures for populations in three different cities Summarize information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both vi 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
..., the percentage of family which rented an accommodation in 1918 stood at just under 80 per cent...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... decreased sharply to one half from 1918 to 1971, equal with the proportion of th...
^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'accommodation'.
Suggestion: accommodation
... as the percentage of the family rented an accommodation.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83425414365 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91881124997 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53591160221 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.6352137825 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303759527483 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18651359292 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111357115013 0.0843802449381 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228757064447 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991462203604 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.