The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The bar chart depicts that percentage of users who use the number of social networking sites in Canada in 2014 & 2015.
Overall, one site had highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, the lowest number of users used five sites during 2 years. Number of users who did not use any site was almost same through the period.
As the graph shows, there was slight decrease in the categories of no sites. From 22% in 2014 to 21% in 2015. Afterwards, 36% people used one site in 2015. But these trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8% in 2015 that was the most popular among dwellers. The number of users for two sites categories remained similar, around at 23% in 2014 and 24% in 2015.
Furthermore, before witnessing a rise, the proportion for three sites users accounted for about 12% in 2014. Meantime, in terms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% in 2015. Lastly, only 2% used five sites in 2014 and growth of number in 2015 with 2% in 2015. Hence, this categories had the lowest user over the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-14 | Ieltsbg | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Hanabi | view | |
| 2022-01-27 | Chloe Pham | view | |
| 2022-01-19 | koshagohil | 67 | view |
- Nowadays most people choose to throw away broken things instead of repairing them, and replace them with new ones. Why is this happening? What problems may it lead to? 61
- The table below gives information about UK independent films 50
- The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking. Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...a in 2014 & 2015. Overall, one site had highest user in 2014 & 2015 while, the lowest n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d one site in 2015. But these trend for this categories experienced a declined by 8%...
^^^^
Line 7, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of four sites, it had only 5% user in 2014 while it increased slightly to 8% i...
^^
Line 7, column 309, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... number in 2015 with 2% in 2015. Hence, this categories had the lowest user over the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, lastly, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 865.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50520833333 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30866270328 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7573814007 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.0833333333 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378769648378 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160691318629 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13150579175 0.0843802449381 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284361188708 0.15604864568 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11113017726 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.