Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions?
It is true that some companies complain about the poor interpersonal skills of their new staff. While some reasons for this can be identified, there are solutions which firms should adopt.
As many new employees are school-leavers, the causes of this problem can be found in the home and in the school. A child’s personality is shaped during the formative years of home-life and schooling. In terms of the home, close-knit families are a thing of the past in many societies, and youngsters do not learn to live in harmony with one another and with their parents. For example, meal times used to be occasions when families ate together and discussed the tasks to be done and the problems of each family member. In school, children are encouraged to achieve individual excellence in exams, rather than to have social skills and to be team-players.
However, in order to conduct a business efficiently, firms must take steps to train new employees to acquire interpersonal skills. Firstly, cooperative skills should be developed, making the most of the latest management techniques. Some companies in Europe and the USA, for example, organise challenging activity weekends during which staff must work as teams to do mountain-climbing or climbing and camping. Working together, their survival skills are put to the test.
Secondly, codes of conduct at work should be strictly enforced for both new and existing employees to facilitate communication and cooperation.
In conclusion, although some reasons can be suggested as probable causes of this problem, there are measures which companies should take to develop the interpersonal skills of new staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | HuynhHoa | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | 9ngóntay | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | Oanh Pham | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Thu Phuong Dang | 56 | view |
- The charts show the distribution of employment among agriculture industry CN and services in three countries in 1980 and 2020 85
- Today people are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- Task 2: in some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on the television for the public.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions 50
- There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than through continual assessment What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 666, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e social skills and to be team-players. However, in order to conduct a business ...
^^^
Line 4, column 145, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cilitate communication and cooperation. In conclusion, although some reasons can...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02411336741 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562264150943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7118960776 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.307692308 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20097200702 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717569627882 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678745956362 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124154029921 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635923990492 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.