Task 2: Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills, such as cooperative skills. What are the causes and suggest some possible solutions.
It is obvious that recently, poor interpersonal skills can be observed in new staff. While this tendency can be attributed to several factors, there are still many measurements that can be employed to tackle the problem.
The lack of interpersonal skills can be ascribed to the change in the roles of families and educational institutions. In terms of the home, children’s personalities are usually shaped during their formative years, in which parental involvement is of paramount importance. However, due to the ever-growing number of nuclear families, as well as the mass exodus of young couples from the countryside to the city center, ties of kinship and close-knit families tend to become a thing of the past. This tendency has led to inadequate opportunities for parents to teach their children how to live in harmony with one another. From the schools’ perspectives, currently, children are encouraged to obtain individual achievements in exams, instead of attaining social skills, such as teamwork, which has resulted in their inappreciation towards being a team-players.
Thus, in order to conduct business efficiently, corporations should employ more solutions to improve the interpersonal skills of their staff. Firstly, priorities should be provided in different extra-curricular activities to enforce the employees to work as a team with their colleagues. Moreover, the companies should also endow funding for additional training courses, which help their staff to make the most of the latest management techniques. Secondly, the code of conduct at the workplace ought to be strictly implemented for both new and existing employees to promote communication and cooperation.
In conclusion, although this phenomenon may be ascribed to several factors, I would argue that there are many solutions that can be implemented by companies to enhance the interpersonal skills of new staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-24 | HuynhHoa | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-01 | 9ngóntay | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | Oanh Pham | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-13 | Thu Phuong Dang | 56 | view |
- Task 2 It is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people than that of young people in many countries in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 73
- Task 2 Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Task 2 Some people think that hard work and determination bring success Others think other factors such as money and good appearance are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54639175258 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27473198615 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580756013746 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8202801122 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4166666667 7.06120827912 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169143943177 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695337058176 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618793908394 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105540769199 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270354934979 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.