Task 2: In some countries, advertisers increase the amount of advertising which tries to persuade children to buy snacks, toys and other goods. Parents object to such pressure on children. But some advertisers claim that there is useful information in these advertisements. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is undeniable that numerous commercial advertising campaigns have been conducted to attract children. While some people argue that such advertisements are informative and beneficial for youngsters, I believe that they are totally unnecessary and disadvantageous for children.
On the one hand, some corporations confirm that the objective of their marketing activities is merely to inform the children about a range of choices of products. When promoting the products, they suppose that their information can provide adequate knowledge to help youngsters to make appropriate decisions when purchasing their goods. For example, when a chocolate bar is launched, children can only learn about the chemical ingredients and nutrients of this product via commercial advertisements, which may hardly be found in the conventional lectures of their educational institutions. Thus, it is necessary to aim at children as the target audiences. Moreover, if this information is not frequently imparted to the youngster, they would enter adult life without these useful skills.
On the other hand, I concur with the argument that parents should be wary of the marketing campaigns that are increasingly exposed to their children. Firstly, the children have inadequate experience in market judgments. They are likely to be swayed by several forms of advertisements, especially celebrity endorsement, which includes the glamorous appearance of their favorite celebrities. For instance, the introduction of new designer products along with the presence of famous superstars can effectively stimulate youngsters to squander their savings, especially when some of their friends have already possessed these items. Secondly, youngsters should be allowed to experience the simplicity of their childhood instead of facing the complications of financial problems, because the pressure of consumption is an inevitable consequence of modern life.
In conclusion, I agree with the opinion that the advertising companies are exerting many pressures on the choices of consumption of children, which are unnecessary for their childhood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
- Task 2 An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 84
- Task 2 Many people now use written language in a less formal and more relaxed way than in the past Why is this the case Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Task 2 Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 89
- Task 2 In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Task 2 Some people think that hard work and determination bring success Others think other factors such as money and good appearance are more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86731391586 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25865060125 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585760517799 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3571661594 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.461538462 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227065118596 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874202831851 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604420420304 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159855232621 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586207653903 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.