People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are the reasons for this, and how can people learn more about the natural world?
It is incontrovertible that these days, less attention has been given to the natural world. While this tendency can be attributed to several reasons, I believe that numerous solutions can be employed to tackle the problem.
On the one hand, one of the major reasons why people tend to disregard the paramount importance of the natural world is the gradual disappearance of traditional ways of life. In terms of work, farming, hunting, or fishing are currently the occupations of the minor population of the workforce in the countryside. Meanwhile, due to the emergence of leading-edge technology, people tend to spend most of their life for sedentary jobs in closed environments, such as offices or factories, which prevent them from interacting with the outside environment. From the perspective of culture, traditional festivals regarding natural seasons have also fallen by the wayside. The celebration of nature such as times for spring or harvest, which provide a link to our roots, is now only conducted by the hands of aging populations, while younger generations are now addicted to different kinds of electronic media.
On the other hand, despite the aforementioned reasons, I suppose that the national authorities and educational institutions can solve this phenomenon by implementing different measures. Firstly, people should be given more opportunities to participate in different voluntary jobs, which involve the protection of the environment or endangered species. Secondly, advertising corporations should also allocate resources to stimulate a revival of interest among their target audiences by showing more TV programs regarding environmental problems such as global warming or contamination. Furthermore, the lecturers should also provide more lessons about life on the planet to give their students a sense of responsibility in preventing environmental degradation. Additionally, parental involvement is also crucial to raise environmental awareness among children.
In conclusion, although there are several factors contributing to the less understanding of the natural world, I suppose that there are many ways that can be applied to overcome this lack of knowledge.
- Task 2 Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 84
- Task 2 An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 84
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- Task 2 Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1867.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67477203647 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32842708254 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592705167173 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.9919689107 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.615384615 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3076923077 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3846153846 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273358978271 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827059945241 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680208699559 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157999365456 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461188381819 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.