While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience, to what extend do you agree or disagree. Give your opinion and include relevant examples:
There are numerable factors that need to be taken into consideration while selecting a candidate for a particular job. There are two dimensions of the topic; some people believe that while interviewing, recruiters need to look for the personal attributes and the qualities instead of the professional expertise and the relevant academic background. I partially agree with this phenomenon, as both perspectives hold due significance and modest approach should be followed.
To begin with, predominantly, personal traits are of the utmost importance as they influence professional behaviors, eventually, hampering the working environment or establishing a friendly atmosphere. For instance, an employee, who is skillful but is arrogant and an introvert, would not sustain in the company for a longer period of time. They would lack building professional bonding with the other colleagues and end up being isolated at the workplace. Similarly, a skillful employee possessing all the information and expertise would not be of any significant value, If they are not helping their fellow colleagues to grow.
On the contrary, required experience and qualifications are of paramount importance as these attributes will lead to some productive and profitable outcomes. Mostly, academic-stem and relevant experience take priority over personality traits, while recruiting A polite and friendly employee having no expertise for the job they are hired for, is useless. The Organization would be more focused towards the productivity levels and the value additions which a person is going to add.
To summarize, I reiterate that both approaches hold relative significance while selecting a candidate. The importance of experience and relevant qualification cannot be negated at any cost, and the same time, personal qualities of the person should be taken into consideration, in order to choose a valuable asset for the company.
- You work for an international company, and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:•explain why you want to work in the company’s head office for six months•say how 81
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world. Why is this? What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 73
- A item of clothing you purchased but found some issues with it once you returned home. Letter to the manager of the shop.In the letter, you should:•what the item was•what were the issues•and what you expect the store manager to do. 73
- Nowadays many people working from home Some think it is beneficial to the employee others think it may distract the family routine What is my opinion 95
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people s sugar consumption while others think that it is individuals responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat Discuss both views and gi 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...not sustain in the company for a longer period of time. They would lack building professional ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 603, Rule ID: FELLOW_CLASSMATE[1]
Message: Use simply 'colleagues'.
Suggestion: colleagues
...nt value, If they are not helping their fellow colleagues to grow. On the contrary, required ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver personality traits, while recruiting A polite and friendly employee having no...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, similarly, so, while, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6275862069 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27771998131 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4385741274 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1666666667 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120332332614 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439334331179 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296296625295 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809137250418 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289731324126 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.