It is a fact that providing assistance to all people who are in need of help is impossible, so some hold the belief that nations should only address their own issues before taking care of international concerns. Personally, I totally disagree with this point of view while I believe that domestic people are a priority.
There are a variety of reasons why we should cooperate with other countries in order to find out solutions for difficulties they are facing. Firstly, in the age of globalization, all countries have certain effects on one another economically and culturally. So helping others is also a preventative measure for predictable issues. Case in point, in the past, when several European countries had to face a currency crisis, they were helped by a lot of related countries all over the world. Secondly, one problem would be far over the ability of a nation, but others can tackle it easily because every nation has its own strong points. For example, African countries are trying to survive in poverty and children are dying because of starvation and treatable diseases. In this case, the rich worldwide can donate to some charity fund, from clothes to money or pay for welfare there.
Last but not least, it would be really morally wrong if we just ignore unfortunate people while we can help. Because no matter where we live, all people deserve others' help to have better lives.
At the same time, communities also need to pay attention to address their difficulties as a priority. There are always people who are in trouble anywhere, not only in poor areas but also in most developed countries. For example, thousands of homeless in the USA are wandering on streets by day by night and they survive on the little amount of money from the government. We can help them without effort because they are right at our doorsteps. Moreover, a government cannot be concerned with foreign issues if it leaves behind domestic citizens. The reality proved that groups of people have had mass movements to demonstrate against the government because their problems were not solved.
In conclusion, I do not subscribe to the opinion and strongly believe that communities and countries should take account of both national and international problems together.
- Some people think that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 89
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- Some people think that teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Everyone should become vegetarian because they do not need to eat meat to have a healthy diet. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 544, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... if it leaves behind domestic citizens. this situation may result in movements of un...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 374.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02673796791 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77104435852 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572192513369 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2987921154 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.444444444 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05555555556 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263188458458 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748891708426 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518517960584 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146811281142 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425719592641 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.